| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 |
21. Oi, Oi, Oi - CONCORD Ships - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
FIX IT wrote: ISD Max Trix wrote: So would you like CCP to removed the ships? What is your ideal solution to this situation? CCP could use the existing reward mechanism and hand out copies of them to every account in eve crashing the pr...
- by Jenn aSide - at 2017.06.15 12:39:14
|
22. Oi, Oi, Oi - CONCORD Ships - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Cypherous wrote: Scipio Artelius wrote: Cypherous wrote: Working exactly as intended, players set the prices for these ships anyway, if nobody buys them the value goes down until people do start buying them :P Certainly working as imple...
- by Jenn aSide - at 2017.06.15 12:30:46
|
23. Solution to isk faucet with supers/carriers in null sec - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
There is no need for any of this. Respawing anoms have existed since 2010. People have been ratting in all manner of ships including carriers and super caps the whole time. The ONLY time it became an issue in the past was with tracking titans (wit...
- by Jenn aSide - at 2017.06.13 19:55:05
|
24. Sticky:[June] Fighter Damage Reduction - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Valdr Auduin wrote: Jenn aSide wrote: Heleana Commodus Luyseyal wrote: CCP should keep on mind that if ppl skilled up for something and invested their real money into it, when they nerf bat that same thing to uselessness, they should refu...
- by Jenn aSide - at 2017.06.13 18:54:17
|
25. What exactly did CCP nerf and what's all the fuss about? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Marek Kanenald wrote: Scialt wrote: The fighter agreession piece was the one part that should NOT have been rolled back at all. CCP seems to think carriers are too useful for PvP. I haven't seen many that believe that... but if that's their...
- by Jenn aSide - at 2017.06.13 15:22:08
|
26. Sticky:[June] Fighter Damage Reduction - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Heleana Commodus Luyseyal wrote: CCP should keep on mind that if ppl skilled up for something and invested their real money into it, when they nerf bat that same thing to uselessness, they should refund skill points that are thrown by players. ...
- by Jenn aSide - at 2017.06.13 14:59:13
|
27. Plex ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
It's good you posted first before doing anything, Sameli Adelora . My buddy came back to the game and didn't know a change happened and paid 1.3 bil for a pliex. A PLEX. So he's out 1.3 bil and still needed 499 plex lol. I donated him a month o...
- by Jenn aSide - at 2017.06.13 14:00:43
|
28. Sticky:[June] Fighter Damage Reduction - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Mary Timeshift Jane wrote: Gimme Sake wrote: Looking at the arguments in this thread "Mah super cost me 27 bil y u nurf it?!?!" "I nvested x amount of moneyz now the sand box is mine!" "Nerf them not me!" "Blame the game not the player!" "I'...
- by Jenn aSide - at 2017.06.13 12:18:10
|
29. Sticky:[June] Fighter Damage Reduction - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Teckos Pech wrote: Mossyblog Barnes wrote: *sigh* Can you please hire a someone who understands statistical analysis. Taking a "snapshot" from 5 days in "June" is like looking at your bank account during St Paddys day and declaring you ha...
- by Jenn aSide - at 2017.06.12 22:56:26
|
30. Sticky:[June] Fighter Damage Reduction - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Marcel Garsk wrote: baltec1 wrote: This is simply rage at money making machines getting a nerf, we have seen this **** before. Did CCP **** up? Yes. I have seen this coming from day one of the carrier changes which is why I didn't bother to ...
- by Jenn aSide - at 2017.06.12 22:46:41
|
31. Sticky:[June] Fighter Damage Reduction - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
CCP Larrikin wrote: We are working on changes to Anomalies that will reduce the effectiveness of Carriers and Supercarriers. These changes will be announced at a later date.[/list]
Noticed this part. I'll be paying special attention to t...
- by Jenn aSide - at 2017.06.12 19:33:58
|
32. What exactly did CCP nerf and what's all the fuss about? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Scialt wrote: How exactly would gates put a big crimp in sub cap income earning? Are you talking about the time it takes to get to range once you enter as opposed to arriving at range? I honestly use both ranged and warp to zero anom ships (...
- by Jenn aSide - at 2017.06.12 19:13:24
|
33. What exactly did CCP nerf and what's all the fuss about? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Zanar Skwigelf wrote: There is no way anyone advocating for gates to anoms has ratted behind a gate with neuts in system. You know where the safest place in the system is when your blinged BS is getting probed down? Inside the gate. If you ca...
- by Jenn aSide - at 2017.06.12 19:00:43
|
34. What exactly did CCP nerf and what's all the fuss about? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Scialt wrote: Nothing about anything I've proposed in any way nerfs anomalies for anyone OTHER than cap pilots. Yes it does, you were the one who mentioned gates. Gates would put a big crimp in sub cap income earning and make subcaps saf...
- by Jenn aSide - at 2017.06.12 18:34:24
|
35. Sticky:[June] Fighter Damage Reduction - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
C0ATL wrote: PenguinBacon wrote: I too can massage data to justify a false conclusion! Per Quant's 2015 presentation 1.5% of the games population logged in and ran incursions This group accounted for at the time 8.36T worth of income ...
- by Jenn aSide - at 2017.06.12 18:27:03
|
36. Sticky:[June] Fighter Damage Reduction - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Sassura wrote: Jenn aSide wrote: Sassura wrote: Jenn aSide wrote: CCP Larrikin wrote: Original Post updated You just explained that almost half the bounties in null sec are generated by only 6% of all ratting characters then ...
- by Jenn aSide - at 2017.06.12 18:05:03
|
37. What exactly did CCP nerf and what's all the fuss about? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Scialt wrote: I'm going to have to give up on this because you refuse to accept the idea that figher squadrons aren't the problem, but rather the ability to make too much isk from fighter squadrons as being the problem. How about this as a...
- by Jenn aSide - at 2017.06.12 17:58:36
|
38. What exactly did CCP nerf and what's all the fuss about? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Callum Perkins wrote: Title says it all really, I hear capitals have been in some way shape or form but could anybody explain? CCP Larrikin updated the original announcement post with some more info. CCP Larrikin wrote: UPDATE 2017-...
- by Jenn aSide - at 2017.06.12 17:50:45
|
39. Sticky:[June] Fighter Damage Reduction - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Wrong place, sry.
- by Jenn aSide - at 2017.06.12 17:48:59
|
40. Sticky:[June] Fighter Damage Reduction - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
PenguinBacon wrote: I too can massage data to justify a false conclusion! Per Quant's 2015 presentation 1.5% of the games population logged in and ran incursions This group accounted for at the time 8.36T worth of income Assuming linear...
- by Jenn aSide - at 2017.06.12 17:40:29
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |